Magic The Gathering Combos
Search Cards & Combos:

Home     Submit A Combo     Deck Builder     Forums     Picture Guess     Help

You are not logged in [click to login] - [Join For Free!]  





Forum Overview >> Combos
Combo Name: Thanks to Terakhan!!!!! Submitted By: Nickosis
Card Name
Type
Cost
P/T
Editions (ordered by release)

Maddening Imp
Summon Imp 2B 1/1 Tempest, Rare

Sleep
Sorcery 2UU Magic 2010, Uncommon
Estimated Combo Cost: $0.63
Date Posted: Wed Dec/11/13 at 5:00 am

Nickosis
Posts: 154
Joined: 31-Mar-12

The ruling for the Imp states that if a creature couldn't attack because of restrictions or was tapped, it is bombed after combat...game, set and match?
Date Posted: Wed Dec/11/13 at 8:36am

Pal-of-Lim-Dul
Posts: 1148
Joined: 24-May-10

Not so sure. The creatures attack if able. They are unable if tapped...
Date Posted: Wed Dec/11/13 at 8:51am

Nickosis
Posts: 154
Joined: 31-Mar-12

According to the official ruling on Gatherer updated 2004, "If a creature can't attack because of some restriction, or because it is tapped, it is destroyed at the end of turn". So yes, I am right and Terakhan, with his combo is right, you lose!
Date Posted: Wed Dec/11/13 at 9:03am

gericault5
Posts: 2788
Joined: 13-Oct-09



@pal - i understand the confusion, i was thinking the same thing until i reread the imp. the imp destroys creatures that did not attack, if they could or couldn't is illrelevent, they didnt attack so bye
Date Posted: Wed Dec/11/13 at 11:36am

Pal-of-Lim-Dul
Posts: 1148
Joined: 24-May-10

Ah I see the second sentence now. Inability to attack is irrelevant as all creatures that did not attack are destroyed. Thanks guys :)



Forum Overview >> Combos

©2006-2023 MTGCombos.com